The Difference between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Plantations in Maximum Biomass and Carbon Storage in Northern Hebei

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.06.009

Abstract

Abstract: In order to understand the differences between the Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica plantations in the biomass carbon storage of in the northern Hebei area,the different maximum biomass carbon storage of the two kinds of plantations was compared.The results shows that Larix principis-rupprechtii was higher than Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica in the individual biomasses of stem,branch and total aboveground,however,for the leaves biomass,Pinus sylvestris var.Mongolica was higher than that of the Larix principis-rupprechtii,when their DBHs were equal.When stand average breast diameter less than 19cm,the stand biomass of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation was higher than that of Pinus sylvestris plantation,and when the DBH was more than 19cm,the stand biomass of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica was higher than that of Larix principis-rupprechtii.For individual tree carbon storage,Larix principis-rupprechtii was higher than that of Pinus sylvestris var.Mongolica.For the forest carbon storage,when the stand average breast diameter was less than 19cm,the total carbon storage of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation was higher than that of Pinus sylvestris plantation,and when the DBH was more than 19cm,the stand carbon storage of Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica was higher than that of Larix principis-rupprechtii.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica, Larix principis-rupprechtii, biomass, carbon storage, north Hebei region

CLC Number:

S718.5

XU Qing, JIANG Fengling, XU Zhongqi, DING Li, LI Hongqian. The Difference between Larix principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Plantations in Maximum Biomass and Carbon Storage in Northern Hebei[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(6): 44-49.

References

[1] 刘国华,傅伯杰,方精云.中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):733-740.
[2] Houghton J T,Ding Y,Griggs D J,et al.Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis[M].Cambridge;Cambridge University Press,2001.
[3] Janssens I A,Freibauer A,Ciais P,et al.Europe's terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropgenic CO₂ emission[J].Science,2003,300:1538-1542.
[4] 于贵瑞,牛栋,王秋凤.《联合国气候变化框架公约》谈判中的焦点问题[J].资源科学,2001,23(6):10-16.
[5] 孙玉军,张俊,韩爱惠.兴安落叶松幼中龄林的生物量与碳汇功能[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):7570-7576.
[6] 刘红梅,吕世杰,刘清泉,等.多伦县樟子松人工林生物量及碳贮量研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2013,34(3):49-50.
[7] 郭颖涛.大兴安岭北部林区主要树种生物量和碳贮量研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2015:8-13.
[8] 于晓秋,刘凤祥,李政林,等.樟子松的特征特性及其效益浅析[J].中国西部科技,2011,10(36):61.
[9] 贾彦龙,许中旗,纪晓林,等.燕山北部山地人工林和天然次生林的生物碳贮量[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(7):1241-1248.
[10] 楚聪颖.河北塞罕坝地区樟子松人工林生长规律及其土壤养分变化[D].保定:河北农业大学,2015:1-62.
[11] 耿丽君,许中旗,张兴锐,等.燕山北部山地华北落叶松人工林生物碳贮量[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(6):43-45.
[12] 徐成立,徐晶,黄大庄.华北落叶松与长白落叶松基本材质材性的研究[J].河北林果研究,2014,29(1):17-22.
[13] 陈信旺.福建柏人工林标准收获表的研究[J].林业勘察设计,2006(1):30-34.
[14] 马长明,张艳华,赵国华,等.燕山山地华北落叶松人工林乔木生物量空间分布格局[J].河北农业大学学报,2010,33(2):37-41.
[15] 杨持.生态学[M].第三版.北京:高等教育出版社,2014.