The Storage Capacity and Water-holding Characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis Litters in Banchengzi Catchment

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.01.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Banchengzi catchment was selected as the study area,and Pinus tabulaeformis was selected to investigate the stock volume and water-holding capacity of litter layers.The results showed that:(1) the stock volume of Pinus tabulaeformis litters was 21.86t/hm²,of which the volume of undecomposed litters was 7.04t/hm² and accounted for 32.20%,the volume of half decomposition was 14.82t/hm² and accounted for 67.80%,and indicated that the volume of undecomposed litters was larger than undecomposed litters;(2) litters volume was significant with leaf area index(LAI),and increased with larger LAI;(3) the water holding of litters showed a process of “rapid absorption-slow absorption-gradual saturation”,the absorption rate decreased with immersion time,and showed a power function relationship(V=ktⁿ).The research results can provide references for forest management and water holding monitoring process in catchments.

Key words: Banchengzi catchment, Pinus tabulaeformis, litters, stock volume, water holding characteristics

CLC Number:

S718.5

ZHENG Guilian, GONG Yinting, WANG Yan. The Storage Capacity and Water-holding Characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis Litters in Banchengzi Catchment[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(1): 44-49.

Figures/Tables 8

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Tab.3

The fitting relationship between water absorption rate of litters and immersion time

层	拟合关系	决定系数
未分解层	y=206.33 $x - 1 . 457$	R²=0.7403
半分解层	y=103.81 $x - 1 . 597$	R²=0.8565

Tab.3

References 16

[1]	董治宝, 李振山. 凤城沙粒度特征对其风蚀可蚀性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 1998,4(4):1-5.
[2]	余新晓, 张志强, 陈丽华, 等. 森林生态水文[M]. 中国林业出版社, 2004: 33-34.
[3]	吴钦孝, 赵鸿雁, 刘向东, 等. 森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 1998,4(2):23-28.
[4]	张振明, 余新晓, 牛健植, 等. 不同林分枯落物层的水文生态功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(3):139-143.
[5]	Tamai K, Abe T, Araki M, et al. Radiation budget,soil heat flux and latent heat flux at the forest floor in warm,temperate mixed forest[J]. Hydrological Processes, 1998,12(13/14):2105-2114.
[6]	宁金魁, 陆元昌, 夏兵, 等. 北京山区油松林森林发展类型设计研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2008(5):57-63.
[7]	李利平, 邢韶华, 赵勃, 等. 北京山区不同区域油松林植物多样性比较研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005,27(4):12-16.
[8]	马履一, 李春义, 王希群, 等. 不同强度间伐对北京山区油松生长及其林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2007,43(5):1-9.
[9]	胡淑萍, 余新晓, 岳永杰. 北京百花山森林枯落物和土壤层水文效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008,22(1):146-150.
[10]	王佑民, 翁俊华. 林地枯落物的水土保持作用[J]. 中国水土保持, 2002(7):18.
[11]	杨澄, 刘建军, 张万庆. 桥山主要森林类型枯落物赤水性能及养分含量测定初报[J]. 西北林学院学报, 1996,11(4):7-11.
[12]	贺宇, 丁国栋, 臧荫桐, 等. 燕山山地典型森林枯落物持水特性[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2012,30(2):161-166.
[13]	梁文俊, 丁国栋, 周美思, 等. 冀北山地油松和落叶松林下枯落物的水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012,32(4):71-74.
[14]	莫菲, 于澎涛, 王彦辉, 等. 六盘山华北落叶松林和红桦林枯落物持水特征及其截持降雨过程[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(6):2868-2876.
[15]	顾宇书, 邢兆凯, 韩友志, 等. 浑河上游4种典型林分类型枯落物持水特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,37(1):31-36.
[16]	杨俊玲, 王新杰. 四种杉木人工林枯落物持水性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013,33(6):70-74.

样地编号	经度/(°)	纬度/(°)	海拔/m	土壤厚度/cm	坡度/(°)
1	116.9373	40.6237	339	35	13
2	116.937	40.622	351.7	45	8
3	116.9366	40.6367	509.4	40	10
4	116.945	40.6332	391.6	35	30
5	116.9832	40.6216	284.6	37	35
6	116.984	40.6234	321.3	42	25
7	116.9899	40.6431	332.7	39	40
8	116.9803	40.6432	359	55	30
9	116.9763	40.6446	370.2	61	35
10	116.9696	40.6466	394	47	8
11	116.9985	40.6577	349.4	35	35
12	116.9971	40.6567	326.1	45	30
13	116.9967	40.6563	334.8	45	35
14	116.9964	40.6569	355.8	39	25
15	116.9947	40.6603	346.3	48	15
16	116.9942	40.6654	338	42	30
17	116.9894	40.6735	435.9	36	35
18	116.9862	40.669	391.5	49	15
19	116.9854	40.663	352.3	57	20
20	116.9828	40.6631	374.3	31	30
21	116.967	40.6657	387.9	55	20
22	116.9669	40.6661	385.9	46	25
23	116.9935	40.6569	343.4	44	40
24	116.9574	40.6693	442.8	35	30
25	116.9516	40.669	456.2	46	25
26	116.9621	40.6728	434.3	53	35
27	116.9603	40.673	410.3	48	30
28	116.9954	40.6529	321.6	47	30
29	116.9678	40.6778	454.4	39	25

浸水时间/h	未分解层	半分解层
0.25	2527.09	1559.51
0.5	184.06	166.42
1	134.80	41.29
2	99.87	43.82
4	73.89	26.54
6	35.83	24.02
8	37.00	4.32
10	8.18	2.53
12	0.45	0.42