Analysis on Characteristics of 19 year-old Semi-Natural Forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Broad-Leaved Trees Based on Stratification

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.06.020

Abstract

Abstract:

The tree stratum of 19 year-old semi-natural forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and broad-leaved trees was stratified obviously to 2 sub-strata (sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II) by MLRP (Maximum Light Receiving Plane) method.The tree height in sub-stratum I was higher than or equal to 13.0 m.Its average stand DBH,height,density and growing stock in tree stratum were 13.7 cm,14.6 m,2 867 N/hm² and 309.7 m³/hm² respectively.Its average stand DBH in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II were 17.1cm and 10.3 cm respectively.Its average stand height in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II were 16.4 m and 10.6 m respectively.Its percentage of stand density in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II were 43.60% and 56.40% respectively.Its percentage of growing stock in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II were 74.98% and 25.02% respectively.There were 17 tree species in tree stratum and C.lanceolata was the absolutely dominant tree species,with the important value of 61.88%.There were 8 and 17 tree species in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II respectively.The important value of C.lanceolata (the absolutely dominant tree species) in sub-stratum I and sub-stratum II was 76.20% and 58.31% respectively.Its species richness (R),Shannon-Wiener index (SW),evenness (E) and ecological dominance (ED) in tree stratum were 17,1.46,0.36 and 0.62 respectively,which in sub-stratum I was 8,0.83,0.28 and 0.78 respectively.And the value in sub-stratum II were 17,1.80,0.44 and 0.51 respectively.

Key words: semi-natural forest, Cunninghamia lanceolata, broad-leaved trees, natural regeneration, tree species composition, diversity, maximum light receiving plane method

CLC Number:

LI Zhiming. Analysis on Characteristics of 19 year-old Semi-Natural Forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Broad-Leaved Trees Based on Stratification[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(6): 123-127.

Figures/Tables 4

Tab.1

Important value of tree species in each sub-stratum in 19 year-old semi-natural forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata and broad-leaved trees%

林层	序号	树种	相对多度	相对优势度	相对频度	重要值
乔木层	1	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	78.20	80.78	26.67	61.88
	2	木荷Schima superba	6.69	8.51	6.67	7.29
	3	白花龙Styrax faberi	4.07	1.13	13.33	6.18
	4	拟赤杨Alniphyllum fortunei	1.16	1.04	8.89	3.70
	5	椤木石楠Photinia bodinieri	1.74	3.23	4.44	3.14
	6	枫香Liquidambar formosana	1.74	0.84	6.67	3.08
	7	南酸枣Choerospondias axillaris	1.74	2.17	4.44	2.79
	8	多脉榆Ulmus castaneifolia	0.87	1.55	4.44	2.29
	9	合欢Albizia julibrissin	0.87	0.20	4.44	1.84
	10	厚壳树Ehretia thyrsiflora	0.58	0.17	4.44	1.73
	11	蓝果树Nyssa sinensis	0.58	0.09	2.22	0.96
	12	香叶树Lindera communis	0.29	0.07	2.22	0.86
	13	石梓Gmelina chinensis	0.29	0.06	2.22	0.86
	14	盐肤木Rhus chinensis	0.29	0.04	2.22	0.85
	15	野茉莉Styrax japonicus	0.29	0.04	2.22	0.85
	16	黄檀Dalbergia hupeana	0.29	0.04	2.22	0.85
	17	山杜英Elaeocarpus sylvestris	0.29	0.04	2.22	0.85
第Ⅰ亚层	1	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	88.00	83.46	57.14	76.20
	2	木荷Schima superba	4.00	6.14	14.29	8.14
	3	椤木石楠Photinia bodinieri	2.67	4.51	4.76	3.98
	4	南酸枣Choerospondias axillaris	2.00	2.57	4.76	3.11
	5	多脉榆Ulmus castaneifolia	1.33	2.19	4.76	2.76
	6	拟赤杨Alniphyllum fortunei	0.67	0.56	4.76	1.99
	7	枫香Liquidambar formosana	0.67	0.51	4.76	1.98
	8	蓝果树Nyssa sinensis	0.67	0.07	4.76	1.83
第Ⅱ亚层	1	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	70.62	75.05	29.27	58.31
	2	木荷Schima superba	8.76	13.60	7.32	9.89
	3	白花龙Styrax faberi	7.22	3.54	14.63	8.46
	4	枫香Liquidambar formosana	2.58	1.54	7.32	3.81
	5	拟赤杨Alniphyllum fortunei	1.55	2.07	7.32	3.64
	6	合欢Albizia julibrissin	1.55	0.62	4.88	2.35
	7	厚壳树Ehretia thyrsiflora	1.03	0.53	4.88	2.15
	8	南酸枣Choerospondias axillaris	1.55	1.32	2.44	1.77
	9	椤木石楠Photinia bodinieri	1.03	0.48	2.44	1.32
	10	香叶树Lindera communis	0.52	0.23	2.44	1.06
	11	石梓Gmelina chinensis	0.52	0.20	2.44	1.05
	12	多脉榆Ulmus castaneifolia	0.52	0.18	2.44	1.05
	13	盐肤木Rhus chinensis	0.52	0.13	2.44	1.03
	14	野茉莉Styrax japonicus	0.52	0.13	2.44	1.03
	15	蓝果树Nyssa sinensis	0.52	0.13	2.44	1.03
	16	黄檀Dalbergia hupeana	0.52	0.12	2.44	1.03
	17	山杜英Elaeocarpus sylvestris	0.52	0.12	2.44	1.03

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 9

[1]	盛炜彤. 中国人工林及其育林体系[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2014.
[2]	王金池, 黄清麟, 马志波, 等. 永安市半天然马尾松阔叶混交林的树种组成与多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2019,55(11):19-26.
[3]	陈存及, 董建文, 林敬德, 等. 半天然杉阔混交林分形成,发育与结构特征[J]. 福建林学院学报, 1996,16(4):310-314.
[4]	陈存及, 陈新芳, 董建文, 等. 半天然杉阔混交林优势种群的增长规律[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2002,10(3):253-257.
[5]	杨梅, 林思祖, 曹光球, 等. 不同生境杉木马尾松半天然混交林物种多样性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(33):14521-14523.
[6]	曹光球, 林思祖, 曹子林, 等. 半天然杉阔混交林杉木及其伴生树种种群空间格局[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2002,19(2):148-152.
[7]	王伯荪, 余世孝, 彭少麟, 等. 植物群落学实验手册[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1996.
[8]	孟宪宇. 测树学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996.
[9]	庄崇洋, 黄清麟, 马志波, 等. 中亚热带天然阔叶林林层划分新方法——最大受光面法[J]. 林业科学, 2017,53(3):1-11.

径阶/cm	6	8	10	12	14	16	18	20	22	24	26
乔木层/(株/hm²)	408	333	417	383	400	308	250	183	117	50	17
杉木/(株/hm²)	217	242	333	333	350	258	233	150	83	84	9
阔叶树/(株/hm²)	192	92	83	50	50	50	17	33	33	17	8

[1]	WANG Yihe. Analysis on Effect of Inter-planting Broad-leaved Trees on Quality Improvement of Pinus massoniana Stand in Soil Erosion Area —A Case Study in Changting,Fujian Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(6): 116-122.
[2]	XU Bingbing, BIAN Gengzhan, YI Xuan, ZHU Guangyu, QI Zhantao, LV Yong. Study on the Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Single Tree Stem Form of Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation in Hunan Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(5): 82-88.
[3]	LIU Dan, LI Wenqing, FAN Xiaoliang, HAN Xiaodi. Diversity Analysis of Woody Plants in Tiecha Mountain Nature Reserve [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(3): 67-71.
[4]	LI Zhiming. Characteristics Analysis of Typical Natural Forest of Sloanea sinensis Based on Stratification [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(3): 72-77.
[5]	WANG Jingmin, ZHOU Yuanbo, BU Yuankun, QIAO Yuxin, WANG Jiabao, LI Weizhong. Study on the Coupling Relationship Between Arbor Layer Structure and Shrub Layer Diversity of Chinese Pine Plantation Forests [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(2): 112-119.
[6]	WANG Jiaguo, LI Weijie, ZHANG Hongjun, WU Di, ZHANG Jianli, JIA Zhenzhen. Study on the Diversity and Stability of Plant Communities in Baili hododendron Scenic Area in Guizhou Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(2): 120-125.
[7]	Jiangui PENG. Dynamic Analysis on the Effect of Pinus massoniana Plantation Management at Different Growth Stages [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 62-69.
[8]	WANG Jinchi, HUANG Ruchu, HUANG Qinglin, MA Zhibo, ZHENG Qunrui, YAN Minghai. A Preliminary Report on the New Growth of Natural Broad-leaved Saplings One Year After the Clear-cutting of Pinus massoniana Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(6): 115-120.
[9]	GAO Yu, LI Xu, SU Lanting, GAO Runmei. Study on Plant Diversity of Main Forest Communities in Erlangshan National Forest Park,Shanxi Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(5): 150-156.
[10]	WANG Penghua, FAN Jungong, CHEN Xiangyang, ZHANG Kan, LIN Qingqian, HOU Jianhua. Investigation and Analysis of Birds and Beasts in Liuliping Macaque Provincial Nature Reserve,Hebei Province [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(5): 157-165.
[11]	LI Yongliang, ZHU Nianfu, ZHANG Huaiqing, PENG Jiankang, YANG Tingdong. Real-time Generation Methods for Stand Three-dimensional Models [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(4): 101-106.
[12]	DONG Huihui, QIU Lin, ZHANG Jianshe, WANG Xiaoyun, ZHEN Tiancai, LI Fengying, ZHOU Chuantao, Yu Kaihui. Study on the Diversity of Undergrowth Plant in Four Typical Plantations in Huangbaishan Mountain [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(4): 86-91.
[13]	ZHAO Yichen, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Junqing. Study on Soil Microbial Characteristics of Primitive Broad-leaved Korean Pine Forest [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 132-138.
[14]	LI Zhiming. Tree Species Composition and Diversity of 34 Year-old Schima superba Forest by AMPR Based on Stratification [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 94-98.
[15]	ZHENG Xinxuan, ZHANG Zengke, LIN Huazhen, LIN Xin, WANG Qi, HUANG Liujing. Species Diversity Characteristics of Vegetation Communities in Different Succession Stages in Pingtan Island [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 66-73.