Investigation Method of Root Biomass of Oasis Farmland Shelterbelt

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.05.014

Abstract

Abstract:

Forest carbon sequestration can slow down the deterioration of climate warming,so carbon sink has been a hot research at home and abroad.Plantations of China has become the main body of forestry,the northwest region has become the future forestry development direction,but the northwest carbon sink and biomass research less.In order to explore the northwest area of plantation carbon sink function,and not to destroy the original infrastructure,this research is conducted.In this paper,the growth model of Populus alba var.pyramidalis Bunge.shelterbelt was simulated by the method of space instead time,and the growth model was established according to DBH and tree height from small to large and underground biomass.Based on the investigation of underground biomass,a calculation method,6 steps and corresponding calculation formula of groundwater biomass survey were established,and the growth model of DBH,tree height and underground biomass was established.The DBH and root,lateral root and root biomass models are: $W=0.0268D_{1.3}^{2.1717},W=0.0191D_{1.3}^{2.1346},W=0.0465D_{1.3}^{2.1557}$,the regression relationship is very significant.Compared with the previous model,the models are more reliable and practical.

Key words: root biomass, farmland-channel-forest-road model, farmland shelterbelt, oasis, desert

CLC Number:

S792.11

ZHAO Yingming, LEI Yuancai, YANG Wenbin, BAO Chunyan, GAO Junliang, HUANG Yaru, ZHANG Hongyi. Investigation Method of Root Biomass of Oasis Farmland Shelterbelt[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, (5): 78-85.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.1

Regression equation of underground biomass of single plant of poplar forest in farmland-channel-forest-road model

地点	组件	回归方程	系数			样本容量	最大胸径/cm	相关系数R
地点	组件	回归方程	a	b	c	样本容量	最大胸径/cm	相关系数R
新疆克拉玛依	根	$W = a D 1.3 b$	0.0378	1.9679	0	6	27.97	0.9995^{[31-32,43-44]}
内蒙磴口		$W = a D 1.3 b$	0.0465	2.1557	0	20	41.97	0.9805
新疆克拉玛依		$W = a D 1.3 2 H b + c$	0.0253	0.7049	0	6	27.97	0.9979^{[31-32,43-44]}
新疆墨玉			1	0.6990	18.627	8	27.4	0.9150^[33]
内蒙磴口			0.0509	0.7351	0	20	41.97	0.9808
新疆疏勒		$W = a D 1.3 b H c$	0.034938	1.03524	0.646576	45	—	0.84698^[42]
内蒙磴口	主根	$W = a D 1.3 b$	0.0268	2.1717	0	20	41.97	0.9804
内蒙磴口	主根	$W = a D 1.3 2 H b$	0.0306	0.7363	0	20	41.97	0.9751
	侧根	$W = a D 1.3 b$	0.0191	2.1346	0	20	41.97	0.9587
	侧根	$W = a D 1.3 2 H b$	0.0197	0.7344	0	20	41.97	0.9677

Tab.1

References 44

[1]	Scheffers B R, De Meester L, Bridge T C L, et al.The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people[J].Science, 2016, 354(6313):aaf 7671. doi: 10.1126/science.aai9150 pmid: 27846590
[2]	Delcourt H R, Harris W F. Carbon budget of the southeastern US biota:analysis of historical change in trend from source to sink[J]. Science, 1980,210(4467):321-323. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4467.321 pmid: 17796049
[3]	Eriksson H. Sources and sinks of carbon dioxide in Sweden[J]. Ambio, 1991,20:146-150.
[4]	Schroeder P, Ladd L. Slowing the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide:a biological approach[J]. Climate Change, 1991,19:283-290. doi: 10.1007/BF00140167
[5]	Kurz W A.Apps M J. Contribution of northern forest to the global carbon cycle:Canada as a case study[J]. Water,Air and Soil Pollution, 1993,70:163-176. doi: 10.1007/BF01104994
[6]	Burcshel P, Kursten E. Present role of German forest and forestry in the national carbon budget and options to its increase[J]. Water,Air and Soil Pollution, 1993,70:325-340. doi: 10.1007/BF01105005
[7]	Krankine O N, Dixon R K. Forest management option to conserve and sequester terrestrial carbon in the Russian Federation[J]. World Resources Review, 1994,6(1):88-101.
[8]	Karjalainen T, Seppo K. Carbon balance in the forest sector in Finland during 1990—2039[J]. Climate Change, 1995,31:451-478.
[9]	Fang J, Chen A, Peng C, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001,292(5525):2320-2322. doi: 10.1126/science.1058629 pmid: 11423660
[10]	方精云, 郭兆迪, 朴世龙, 等. 1981— 2000 年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J]. 中国科学:D 辑, 2007,37(6):804-812.
[11]	支玲, 许文强, 洪家宜, 等. 森林碳汇价值评价——三北防护林体系工程人工林案例[J].林业经济, 2008(3):41-44.
[12]	刘国华, 傅伯杰, 方精云. 中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J]. 生态学报, 2000,20(5):733-740.
[13]	于振良. 我国主要森林生态系统碳贮量和碳平衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000,24(5):518-522.
[14]	王效科, 冯宗炜, 欧阳志云. 中国森林生态系统的植物碳储量和碳密度研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001,12(1):13-16.
[15]	方精云, 陈安平. 中国森林植被碳库的动态变化及其意义[J]. 植物学报, 2001,43(9):967-973.
[16]	Fan S M., Glorr M, Mahlman J. Large terrestrial carbonsink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic CO₂ data and models[J]. Science, 1998,282:442-446. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5388.442 pmid: 9774264
[17]	Pasquale A M, Scotti R. Top-down growth model:a prototype for poplar Italy[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002,161:65-73.
[18]	Daniel W M, Denys Y, Glenn F, et al. Yield in short rotation coppice:model simulations using the process model SECRETS[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2004,6:345-358. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.010
[19]	Carlo C, Ingmar T, Eve E, et al. Canopy profiles of photosynthetic parameters CO₂ and N fertilization in a poplar plantation[J]. Environment Pollution, 2005,137:525-535. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.038
[20]	文仕知, 田大伦, 杨丽丽, 等. 桤木人工林的碳密度,碳库及碳吸存特征[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(6):15-21. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100603
[21]	Laclau P. Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in northwest Patagonia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003,180(1):317-333. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00580-7
[22]	雷丕锋, 项文化, 田大伦, 等. 樟树人工林生态系统碳素贮量与分布研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004,23(4):25-30.
[23]	包维楷, 雷波, 冷俐. 六种人工针叶幼林下地表苔藓植物生物量与碳贮量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005,16(10):1817-1821.
[24]	李轩然, 刘琪璟, 陈永瑞, 等. 千烟洲人工林主要树种地上生物量的估算[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006,17(8):1382-1388.
[25]	Winjum J K, Schroeder P E. Forest plantations of the world:their extent,ecological attributes,and carbon storage[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1997,84(1):153-167.
[26]	周传艳, 周国逸, 王春林, 等. 广东省森林植被恢复下的碳储量动态[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2007,29(2):60-65.
[27]	吴鹏飞, 朱波, 刘世荣, 等. 不同林龄桤-柏混交林生态系统的碳储量及其分配[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(7):1419-1424.
[28]	田大伦, 方晰, 项文化. 湖南会同杉木人工林生态系统碳素密度[J]. 生态学报, 2004,24(11):2382-2386.
[29]	张林, 王礼茂, 王睿博. 长江中上游防护林体系森林植被碳贮量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009,18(2):111-115.
[30]	耿相国. 平原区农田防护林杨树单株碳含量,碳储量及其分配[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010.
[31]	魏艳敏. 荒漠环境规模化人工杨树生物量和碳储量的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学, 2010.
[32]	胡莎莎, 张毓涛, 李吉玫, 新疆杨生物量空间分布特征研究[J].新疆农业科学2012, 49(6):1059-1065.
[33]	桑巴叶, 朱玉伟, 陈启民, 等. 新疆杨不同林龄农田防护林的碳储量[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(8):1455-1461.
[34]	张丽华, 陈亚宁, 赵锐锋, 等. 干旱区杨树,榆树人工防护林地土壤 CO₂ 释放通量研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(5):526-534. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.05.006
[35]	王永红, 朱玉伟, 桑巴叶, 等. 不同林龄新疆杨养分特征与生物量研究[J].防护林科技, 2015(11):4-6.
[36]	关晋宏, 杜盛, 程积民, 等. 甘肃省森林碳储量现状与固碳速率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016,40(4):304-317. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0017
[37]	杨晓菲, 鲁绍伟, 饶良懿, 等. 河南省西平县杨树人工林碳贮量及其分配特征研究[J].林业资源管理, 2010(2):38-42.
[38]	李海奎, 赵鹏祥, 雷渊才, 等. 基于森林清查资料的乔木林生物量估算方法的比较[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(5):44-52. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120507
[39]	郭靖, 王让会, 张仁平, 等. 新疆荒漠区几种典型人工林生态服务功能综合评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014,31(6):1153-1157.
[40]	李海奎, 雷渊才, 曾伟生. 基于森林清查资料的中国森林植被碳储量[J]. 林业科学, 2011,47(7):7-12.
[41]	邓蕾, 上官周平. 基于森林资源清查资料的森林碳储量计量方法[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011,31(6):143-147.
[42]	陈章水, 方奇. 新疆杨元素含量与生物量研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1988,1(5):535-540.
[43]	胡莎莎. 新疆典型森林类型生物量监测研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2012.
[44]	张毓涛, 胡莎莎, 李吉玫, 等. 新疆3种主要森林类型根系生物量变化特征研究[J]. 2013,36(2):269-276.