Mechanism linking multidimensional environmental attributes of national parks to place attachment and psychological restoration

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.06.008

Abstract

Abstract:

With the advancement of the “Healthy China” initiative and the development of China’s national park system,the health-promoting functions of protected areas have attracted increasing attention.Taking Wuyishan National Park as a case study,this research develops a conceptual model of “multidimensional environmental attributes-place attachment-psychological restoration”.Based on 536 on-site questionnaire responses,the measurement model was validated and structural path were tested within a structural equation modeling (SEM)framework to elucidate how park environmental attributes influence visitors’ psychological restoration through place attachment.Multidimensional environmental attributes were categorized as natural,social,symbolic,and built attributes,while place attachment comprises place identity and place dependence.The results showed that:1)natural attributes exerted the strongest direct effect on psychological restoration,indicating that the health benefits of national parks are primarily supported by their ecological foundations(e.g.,natural landscapes,biological resources,and air quality).2)symbolic attributes affected psychological restoration mainly indirectly via place identity,suggesting that cultural imagery and the meanings attached to the place can enhance restorative experiences by strengthening visitors’ place identity.3)Natural,social,and built attributes operated more stronglythrough place dependence,implying that functional factors such as accessibility,activity support,and service facilities can promote psychological restoration by reinforcing visitors’ place dependence.Overall,place attachment partially mediatedplays a partial mediating role between multidimensional environmental attributes and psychological restoration,and different environmental dimensions correspond to distinc attachment pathways.This study provides empirical evidence for understanding the mechanism through which environmental attributes shape psychological restoration in national parks,and offers implications for optimizing environmental design and enhancing health-service provision on the basis of ecological conservation.

Key words: national park, multidimensional environmental attributes, place attachment, psychological restoration, structural equation modeling

CLC Number:

TU986
S759.9

LIN Zheng, HUANG Qitang. Mechanism linking multidimensional environmental attributes of national parks to place attachment and psychological restoration[J]. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2025, (6): 83-90.

Figures/Tables 4

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 18

[1]	王鹏, 俞飞, 何友均, 等. 国家公园景观视觉美学质量对公众生理反应的影响[J]. 自然保护地, 2024, 4(1):13-24.
[2]	钟林生, 曾瑜皙, 虞虎. 青藏高原国家公园群游憩功能的自然基础与实现路径[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3):861-873.
[3]	钟林生, 张香菊. 国家公园生态产品文化服务价值实现的路径与机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(6):1664-1680. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250614
[4]	KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. The experience of nature:A psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[5]	ULRICH R S, SIMONS R F, LOSITO B D, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1991, 11(3):201-230. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
[6]	TASCI A D A, PIZAM A. An expanded nomological network of experienscape[J]. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2020, 32(3):999-1040. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2018-0988
[7]	张辉, 徐红罡. 触 “景”会生 “情” 吗?:旅游体验场景和目的地熟悉度对游客地方依恋的影响[J]. 旅游学刊, 2023, 37(4):1-16.
[8]	HARTIG T, MITCHELL R, VRIES S, et al. Nature and health[J]. Annual Review of Public Health, 2014, 35(1):207-228. doi: 10.1146/publhealth.2014.35.issue-1
[9]	党宁, 代希, 丁春彬, 等. 环城游憩带疗愈性对游憩者感知健康效益的影响研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2025, 40(1):45-61.
[10]	SCANNELL L, GIFFORD R. Defining place attachment:A tripartite organizing framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
[11]	KYLE G, GRAEFE A, MANNING R. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2005, 37(2):153-177. doi: 10.1177/0013916504269654
[12]	MENATTI L, SUBIZA-PÉREZ M, VILLALPANDO-FLORES A, et al. Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, 63:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.005
[13]	奚望, 陈钢华, 胡宪洋. 旅游度假区游客地方依恋对心理恢复的影响研究:环境恢复性感知的中介作用[J]. 旅游科学, 2021, 35(3):79-99.
[14]	LIU Qunyue, WU Yu, XIAO Yiheng, et al. More meaningful,more restorative? Linking local landscape characteristics and place attachment to restorative perceptions of urban park visitors[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2020, 197:103763. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103763
[15]	WILLIAMS D R, VASKE J J. The measurement of place attachment:Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach[J]. Forest Science, 2003, 49(6):830-840. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/49.6.830
[16]	黄雯雯, 林广思. 城市绿地健康影响机制的理论和实证研究综述[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 2021, 36(2):1-10.
[17]	周卫, 聂晓嘉, 闫晨, 等. 森林公园游客恢复性知觉、场所依恋与幸福感的关系研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41(5):527-535.
[18]	STAATS H, KIEVIET A, HARTIG T. Where to recover from attentional fatigue:An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(2):147-157. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3

特征	类别	人数	百分比/%
性别	男性	253	47.2
	女性	283	52.8
年龄	18~20岁	68	12.7
	21~30岁	106	19.8
	31~40岁	113	21.1
	41~50岁	93	17.4
	51岁及以上	156	29.1
教育程度	高中及以下	79	14.7
	大专	93	17.4
	本科	255	47.6
	硕士及以上	109	20.3
来源地	省内(非本地)	365	68.1
	省外	115	21.5
	本地	56	10.4

维度	属性	题项
环境属性	自然属性	这里的空气非常清新
		自然景观富有吸引力
		生物资源丰富
	社会属性	游客之间氛围友好
		人文环境较为和谐
		工作人员态度友好
	象征属性	文化意象让我产生共鸣
		感受到地方独特的符号与精神意涵
		承载着独特的历史文化记忆
	建成属性	休闲配套设施完善
		可开展的活动类型多样
		活动场地有明确的主题分区
		步道规划合理、出行便利
场所依恋	地方认同	我觉得这里是我向往的地方
		我对这里有情感归属
		这里对我意义重大
		我为来到这里感到自豪
	地方依赖	我在其他地方难以获得类似体验
		这里满足我放松休闲的需要
		与其他地方相比,这里更适合我进行游憩活动
		如果不能来这里,我会感到失落
恢复效益	心理恢复	在这里我感到身心得到恢复
		在这里让我内心更平静放松
		在这里让我压力得到缓解
		在这里让我精力得到恢复

路径	标准化系数(β)	P值
自然属性→心理恢复	0.228	<0.001
社会属性→心理恢复	0.187	0.002
象征属性→心理恢复	0.103	0.041
建成属性→心理恢复	0.119	0.015
自然属性→地方依赖	0.203	<0.001
社会属性→地方依赖	0.177	0.003
象征属性→地方认同	0.314	<0.001
建成属性→地方依赖	0.162	0.006
地方认同→心理恢复	0.271	<0.001
地方依赖→心理恢复	0.198	<0.001

路径	中介效应值	标准误差	下限	上限	P
象征属性→地方认同→心理恢复	0.085	0.021	0.049	0.132	0.002
自然属性→地方依赖→心理恢复	0.059	0.022	0.018	0.104	0.006
社会属性→地方依赖→心理恢复	0.042	0.016	0.010	0.075	0.009
建成属性→地方依赖→心理恢复	0.045	0.017	0.012	0.078	0.008